Hypothesis

An alternative methodology for the prediction of adherence to anti HIV treatment

I Richard Thompson¹ , Penelope Bidgood² , Andrea Petróczi¹ , James CW Denholm-Price² , Mark D Fielder¹ and The EuResist Network Study Group³

¹  School of Life Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston-upon-Thames. KT1 2EE, UK

²  Faculty of Computing, Information Systems and Mathematics, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston-upon-Thames. KT1 2EE, UK

³  EuResist, Via del Commercio, 36 - 00154 Rome - Italy http://www.euresist.org

author email corresponding author email

AIDS Research and Therapy 2009, 6:9doi:10.1186/1742-6405-6-9

Published:	1 June 2009

Abstract

Background

Successful treatment of HIV-positive patients is fundamental to controlling the progression to AIDS. Causes of treatment failure are either related to drug resistance and/or insufficient drug levels in the blood. Severe side effects, coupled with the intense nature of many regimens, can lead to treatment fatigue and consequently to periodic or permanent non-adherence. Although non-adherence is a recognised problem in HIV treatment, it is still poorly detected in both clinical practice and research and often based on unreliable information such as self-reports, or in a research setting, Medication Events Monitoring System caps or prescription refill rates. To meet the need for having objective information on adherence, we propose a method using viral load and HIV genome sequence data to identify non-adherence amongst patients.

Presentation of the hypothesis

With non-adherence operationally defined as a sharp increase in viral load in the absence of mutation, it is hypothesised that periods of non-adherence can be identified retrospectively based on the observed relationship between changes in viral load and mutation.

Testing the hypothesis

Spikes in the viral load (VL) can be identified from time periods over which VL rises above the undetectable level to a point at which the VL decreases by a threshold amount. The presence of mutations can be established by comparing each sequence to a reference sequence and by comparing sequences in pairs taken sequentially in time, in order to identify changes within the sequences at or around 'treatment change events'. Observed spikes in VL measurements without mutation in the corresponding sequence data then serve as a proxy indicator of non-adherence.

Implications of the hypothesis

It is envisaged that the validation of the hypothesised approach will serve as a first step on the road to clinical practice. The information inferred from clinical data on adherence would be a crucially important feature of treatment prediction tools provided for practitioners to aid daily practice. In addition, distinct characteristics of biological markers routinely used to assess the state of the disease may be identified in the adherent and non-adherent groups. This latter approach would directly help clinicians to differentiate between non-responding and non-adherent patients.