Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessShort report

Significant improvements in self-reported gastrointestinal tolerability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and adherence with lopinavir/ritonavir tablet formulation compared with soft gel capsules

Shannon Schrader1 email, Susan K Chuck2 email, Laurie W Rahn2 email, Paras Parekh2 email and Katherine G Emrich2 email

The Schrader Clinic, Houston, USA

Abbott Virology, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, USA

author email corresponding author email

AIDS Research and Therapy 2008, 5:21doi:10.1186/1742-6405-5-21

Published: 17 September 2008

Abstract

Background

The tablet formulation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r; Kaletra®) has many advantages over the soft gel capsule (SGC) formulation, including lower pill count, no refrigeration requirement, and no dietary restrictions. These advantages may help improve patient compliance and therefore increase adherence to treatment. However, there are limited data regarding patient preferences and only recently was the comparative efficacy and tolerability data of LPV/r SGC versus tablet formulation presented at an international conference. To address this deficit, we conducted a market research survey to assess potential tolerability benefits, patient satisfaction, changes in adherence, and formulation preference in patients switching from SGCs to the tablet formulation. Data from 332 patients who switched from LPV/r SGCs twice-daily (BID) to tablets BID and 41 patients who switched from LPV/r SGCs BID or once daily (QD) to tablets QD were analyzed.

Results

Switching from SGCs to a tablet formulation of LPV/r was associated with increased patient satisfaction, tolerability and self-reported adherence to treatment; gastrointestinal side effects were reduced. In addition, respondents indicated that they preferred the tablet formulation to the SGC.

Conclusion

The LPV/r tablet formulation provides HIV-infected patients with multiple benefits over the SGC in terms of tolerability and convenience. Additional assessments to further define the tolerability profile of the LPV/r tablet, including studies using once-daily dosing, are warranted.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.